Archive for the ‘Hillary’ Category

A Teaser…

June 29, 2020

Soon I Shall Tell You





Speaking of Politicians…

We know what American politicians love best – WAR. These maniacs see everything as a YOU AGAINST ME proposition. War on Poverty… War on Drugs… War on a Virus… Mostly war against some nation with a GDP far less than the monetary value of the bombs dropped on them, blowing them up so we can have a sense of “victory”. Politicians know that using WAR is a war to quash dissent. People question the loyalty, patriotism, even the SANITY of anyone who asks WHY ARE WE DOING THIS?
What a deadly way to live! Here is a book I believe EVERYONE should read! It tells, bluntly, who we as a nation are AND WHY WE HAVE GONE TO WAR almost non-stop since we began as a nation!

War Is A Racket Announcement

Click Image To Enlarge

Click HERE To See This Book At AMAZON.COM!

FROM MOJO BROS. PUBLISHING: Two-Time Medal of Honor recipient Maj. Gen. Smedley D. Butler’s famous essay on the horrors and futility of war – now in a facsimile edition. Peeling away the patriotic veneer used to win support for war, Butler tells why we go to war, who is behind it and who profits.
This book contains a FACSIMILE of the 1935 original. And more!
In the 1930s, a cabal of Wall Street businessmen, alarmed by what President Franklin D. Roosevelt was doing to spur the economy, planned to remove FDR. The plan – known as The Business Plot – called for rallying disaffected WW1 Veterans under a military leader who could unite them. That man, these plotters thought, was the retired Maj. Gen. Butler. They tried to win Butler to their cause with a promise of making him the a national dictator. They could not have been more mistaken! This book has a section showing Butler’s role in revealing this treasonous plot.
In an ALL-NEW forward, we tell the story of those times and – for the first time ever! – present recently declassified documents from Smedley Butler’s FBI file!


Don’t Be A Mark

February 15, 2020

You think these people have changed since 2016?
The smirking fair-haired chap below is democrat stalwart RICHARD GEPHARDT – one of the founders of the Democratic Leadership Council, along with the odious Clintons and the world’s biggest hypocrite, that major pot-head Al Gore who helped wage the war on… pot smokers.

Click For Article

THESE are the behind-the-scenes “Leaders” democrat voters support out of sheer ignorance, hatred, and baldfaced stupidity. And by “support,” I mean anyone in that party. If you participate in this nefarious group of neo-liberal money-grubbers YOU are part of the problem. Unless you honestly believe that electing democrats will make things better. In that case you may be well served by having a psychiatric team look into your symptoms…
(AND NOTE THAT IN 2016 WE WERE STILL TALKING ABOUT “SINGLE-PAYER”. Since that time these con-artists moved the whole conversation from Single-Payer to Medicare For All – which will leave the insurance companies in charge and still bankrupt millions of Americans annually, so they can apply for Medicaid just as the democrats start to dismantle the program. Thanks, saps! By demanding Medicare for All instead of SINGLE-PAYER, you helped Gephardt KEEP HIS VILE PROMISE TO THE INSURANCE EXECUTIVES.)

Cuomo Medicaid copy

THIS is the classic 1940 study of Con Artists – including politicians. Reading this book will show exactly how today’s millionaire democrats so easily shifted the conversation from SINGLE-PAYER healthcare to MEDICARE FOR ALL which is run by insurance companies. Medicare is USELESS without private insurance. And the Drug part is ALL run by insurance companies.
The hallmark of a con is that the marks REFUSE TO ADMIT THEY WERE CONNED.
And so today people justify their healthcare gullibility with such inanities as: “Bernie’s got a WRITTEN bill that’s CALLED Medicare but it is really SINGLE PAYER.”
The guy who sells the Brooklyn Bridge also flashes written documents… it’s an essential part of any con.
BTW, THE BIG CON is the book that writer David S. Ward plagiarized for THE STING. The case was settled in favor of the writer of The Big Con.

Up DateWell THAT didn’t take long… See below for an example of how a self-deluded mark suckered by “Senator BS” excuses his call for Americans to TURN IN people who work with the EEEEEVIL Russians. It’s no big deal because… IT COULD HAPPEN TO ANYBODY. Guess that whole McCarthy Era was just a minor glitch… Coulda happened to anyone…

Deluded Sanders Mark

Never Trust A Cold War Liberal (Reposted)

February 11, 2020

THIS NEW QUOTATION, FROM THE SENILE SENATOR BS,
MAKES IT NECESSARY TO REPOST:



14611160_10202360169643397_7715071107652487310_n

 

Never trust a “Cold-War Liberal”
They are war-happy.
You can spot them by the repeated warnings they issue about Russia and China.
Mostly Russia.
Cold-War Liberals live in the past.
In a dangerous past.
But to them, in their old age, in their dotage, it is a glorious past.
They are elderly now and the past is all they have left.
It is who they are, because it is who they were.
They cannot look forward.
This is not a game.
The world needs new ideas and new plans.
The end result of the vaunted “thirty years of experience” Hillary Clinton’s “Withers” cite for their candidate is… precisely where we are right now.
The people who put us here, right here, where we are right now, did it deliberately and they will not change things. This is what they want.
Unless we got here by accident, in which case, that much-touted “thirty years of experience” means absolutely nothing.
And if you want to see change: YOU ARE A SOCIALIST TOOL OF PUTIN AND CHINA!!!!
You know you have heard this empty imprecation again and again.
So how can you expect change from someone who denounces change?
See how cold-war senility works?
They got away with that garbage in the 50s and 60s.
These old people saw their dead parents doing it.
So the Cold-War Liberals need to re-live their youth.
But their youth has evanesced.
It is no more.
It is gone.
Elect a Cold-War Liberal aching to recreate her or his heyday of youth and potency, and there will be war, misery, and blood. These old people need war, misery, and blood to feel alive again.
The day of the Cold-War Liberal is over.
THIS is what the exemplary, much-admired Cold-War Liberal had to say about war:
“Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty. This much we pledge–and more.”
That means regime change.
That means war.
That is from a liberal hero.
55 years ago.
We step back to those days at our own peril.
The world is different now. We cannot attack with impunity.
People hit back.
Remember that:
People hit back.

UPDATE:

Now the NY Times reports that Hillary Clinton, in a secret speech revealed by WikiLeaks, has announced her passion for SECRET WARS (click here).
She touts the joys of “covert-intervention,” to use the NY Times euphemism.
Covert-Actions. 
CoIntelPro was covert action
Installing the Shah as dictator of Iran was covert action
Killing Salvador Allende was covert action
Overthrowing Guatemala was covert action
The Bay of Pigs was covert action
The bloodthirsty School of the Americas was covert action
LBJ’s Operation Chaos was covert action
Sabotaging the Democratic Primary was TYPICAL covert action
Henry Kissinger is covert action personified
And Mrs. Clinton LIKES THIS?
Wants MORE of it?
Is she insane?
The Times writes: “Mrs. Clinton gave a tough-minded, realpolitik answer to the question of how to handle a problem like Syria. If the best chance of success was to act secretly inside that country, she made clear, she had no problem doing that.”
Oh… She has no problem doing that? How lofty of her.
Unfortunately for this elderly
termagant THE WORLD HAS A PROBLEM WITH YOU DOING THAT, you war-crazy maniac!
Mission Impossible was TV FANTASY. Not a Foreign Policy Primer.
I will not vote for more wars.
Especially secret wars. You know, like NIXON IN CAMBODIA which led to this:

1971

This is a democracy, despite what this Cold War Neoliberal thinks.
As to the Times: saying her call to secret war is “tough-minded, realpolitik” is not journalism, it is editorializing. You are putting lipstick on that pig.

How much more NIXONIAN will Clinton reveal herself to be?
She may well take the White House, this bloodthirsty Cold War Neoliberal, but not with my consent.

new-nixon

FURTHER UPDATE:

Late in October, Tim Kaine CONFIRMED that Hillary’s first action will be to ask Congress for unlimited war powers.
As with all neocons, which the Cold War Liberals have spawned, Hillary actually believes that in wartime the nation will unite. She is a big step into the past. Cold War Liberals are in their dotage now and should just take the gold watch then go home to their republican grandchildren.

screen-shot-2016-10-28-at-2-35-00-pm



If you don’t remember the hysteria over
COMMUNISTS and RUSSIANS trying to take over
the world, and want to see what it was like…
click the image below…

ALTERNATE HISTORYThis jingoistic fantasy from 1947 presents the sort of INSANITY Cold War Liberals still have orgasms over. To this day these senescent twits obsess over Russia. We still hear to this day, for example, that it’s those crafty Russians who somehow whipped up racial animosities in America, bringing about lynchings and Jim Crow. 

A classic piece of vintage paranoia from 1947 – the dawn of Harry Truman’s Cold War. Just two years earlier, Soviet Russia was our ally. Then suddenly, they became The Evil Empire bent on taking over America. This comic book presents a wild fantasy on the theme of America falling to the dirty commies. A valuable look at a moment in history, painstakingly restored digitally and enhanced! No other version looks this good!
A must for understanding the roots of today’s lingering fear and hatred of Russia and the Russians.
It all traces back to our government’s Post-War need for a perpetual enemy in order to “unify” the people and keep America on a permanent wartime military footing. As we see to this very day, in the Pentagon’s bloated and ever-expanding budget as well the constant saber-rattling of elderly politicians and the more aged of the Baby Boomers… it worked all too well.

is this tomorrow

Click To See This Book At Amazon

Sample Pages

DIGITALLY RESTORED!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

 

Impeachment? Gee, Thanks…

December 19, 2019

pelosi

2016 polling showed that 58% of Trump voters didn’t support Trump – they only voted for him because they adamantly did not want the Clintons back in the White House. Hey, that was the choice, remember?

This time, without a Clinton running, democrats had a simple task before them: appeal to that 58% of Trump voters by running an engaging, middle-of-the-road candidate.

Instead, they packed a clown car with mediocre millionaires and then went out of their way to impeach a president who had little chance of getting reelected in the first place.

Good move…

Rather than work to win over those voters who swung it for Trump while holding their noses, democrats put all their effort into doing the one thing absolutely guaranteed to energize the far right: impeachment.

Thanks to you, congressional democrats, America will be stuck with right wing governments for years to come.

You had a simple task.

The odds were stacked in your favor.

And you blew it.

Thanks… for nothing.

This Just InWhy I Voted Against Impeachment.jpgFascinating to watch this crumble.
As writer Scott Ross so aptly notes, “Democrats can fuck up a wet dream.”
The above article by Rep. Sensenbrenner sums it up (click image for whole story):
QUOTE: Vitriol and blind hatred aside, President Trump has been robbed of his constitutionally protected due process rights. There was no independent investigation. Instead, Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, conducted a few weeks of closed-door hearings in the basement of the Capitol Visitor Center. This is the same man who infamously stated on cable television that he had overwhelming evidence that President Trump had colluded with the Russians during the 2016 election. The special counsel Robert Mueller found nothing of the sort.
The closed-door hearings led to a railroad job in the House Judiciary Committee, where a majority denied those of us in the minority our rights. When we finally considered the articles of impeachment, they were so broad and flimsy that almost any other president could most likely have been accused of them. Article II, the obstruction of Congress charge, is particularly bad, as Democrats failed even to give a court — the proper arbiter of these disagreements — the chance to weigh in on the matter.
Further, none of the articles allege that the president committed a crime — a drastic departure from the Nixon and Clinton cases. Nevertheless, Democrats prioritized haste as they jammed through their impeachment vote. Again and again, Democrats told us that Congress could not wait to impeach the president. Yet Speaker Pelosi’s decision to withhold the articles from the Senate shows us that we can apparently wait. This whole exercise has been completely bunk.


Only the hapless, ineffectual democrats could not just cause Trump to get elected in the first place, but then manage to make him stronger at every turn. Reminds me of “So the bear says to the guy, ‘Tell the truth. You don’t really come here to hunt, do you?'”

ABOUT THAT DELAY…

In the article above, Rep. Sensenbrenner refers to Nancy Pelosi’s “decision to withhold the [impeachment] articles from the Senate.” This raises a fascinating question: Has the congress actually impeached Trump or did they merely vote on articles of impeachment. Harvard Law professor Noah Feldman, who by the way supports impeachment of Trump, startled the political know-it-alls by writing a piece in which he maintains that the House has indeed failed to impeach. Says Feldman over at Bloomberg.com:

“[A]n indefinite delay would pose a serious problem. Impeachment as contemplated by the Constitution does not consist merely of the vote by the House, but of the process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both parts are nfeldman.jpegecessary to make an impeachment under the Constitution: The House must actually send the articles and send managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment. And the Senate must actually hold a trial.If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all. That’s because ‘impeachment’ under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of impeachment to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.” (emphasis added)

Got that? “…House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.” And that simply has not happened. Feldman explains: As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, ‘TRUMP IMPEACHED,’ those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message.”

I see it as similar to those people who always say things like, “I want to thank you for all you’ve done” but they never actually do get around to thanking anyone. They just say that they want to. Or, to reply in advance to a specious objection certain to be raised by the millions of “legal experts” who got a law degree by watching cable-TV Law & Order reruns, it’s like a criminal suspect getting indicted by a grand jury, but afterwards never getting charged or arraigned. In that case, the indictment means diddlysquat (and yes, I checked this with an actual former prosecutor – who does not own a television). And no, Feldman is not related to the late Jeffrey Epstein…

Read This, Please

November 5, 2019

Scott Ross

Scott Assange

CLICK THE IMAGE TO READ THIS PIECE

 

ATTENTION ALL IDIOTS!

October 15, 2019

I address today you PUDDING-BRAINED TRUMP-FIXATED MORONS who call yourself LIBERAL even while you smugly cheer the proposed federal law slyly called The Journalist Protection Act.
I know I ask a lot of you idiots but… THINK FOR THE FIRST TIME IN YOUR FUCKING LIFE.
If the federal government would pass a law to “protect” WORKING JOURNALISTS then the law HAS TO DEFINE WHO THE GOVERNMENT DEEMS “ACCEPTABLE” AS A JOURNALIST.
And WHO THEY DO NOT.

Under this law journalists will need FEDERAL JOURNALIST PERMITS. You think that’s GOOD?
(And no, you ignorant assholes, a Press Pass does not equal a permit)

Oh, you stupid, deranged, feculent, numbskulls!
Your insane hatred of Trump makes you CONSISTENTLY PUSH TO WATER DOWN THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

Look, shit-heads, I CANNOT SAY IT MORE CLEARLY:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Got that? NO LAW ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR OF THE PRESS.
NONE.
Not SOME laws.
Not ONLY A DOZEN LAWS…
NONE!

The Framers knew well the art of prose. They ably demonstrated their ability to write expertly. THEY FUCKING SAID NO LAWS!!! The First Amendment is all the protection journalists need AND NEOFASCISTS LIKE SENATOR BLUMENTHAL KNOW THIS or he would not promulgate a law giving government the UNCONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY to decide who the First Amendment applies to.

And again, to you dimwits who fancy yourselves lawyers because you gaze empty-headed at your TV watching Law and Order: Yes, it says CONGRESS but your State government cannot do this because local governments CANNOT GRANT FEWER RIGHTS THAN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

McResistanceHey, you infantile, certifiable twits who satisfy your Cosplay egos by branding yourself “The Resistance”: Face the fact that you refuse to accept that a corrupt, obese, alcoholic, belligerent, old lady who long ago earned the sobriquet “Congenital Liar”, lost the 2016 election. This rage, and your continuous tantrum, blinds you to EVERYTHING else. Now you want to further gut the Bill of Rights because you don’t like the way Trump mocks journalists. Well done, you sap-heads! You have now truly become what Stalin called USEFUL IDIOTS – doing the work of the very fascists you so loudly CLAIM TO OPPOSE. You have the brains of a salami. Here’s my suggestion to all of you… Go back to watching your endless stream of Star Wars sequels and:


May I Recommend:

Scot Blog: Delerius Liberalis

Click The Image To Read This Essay

 


signbot Bill of Rights

5-amendment

According to trust-fund baby Andrew Cuomo, a man of such low moral fiber that a KENNEDY divorced him, the 5th Amendment protection against DOUBLE-JEOPARDY is just a goddamn LOOPHOLE:
loophole Jeopardy

Flaming FascistFrom an October 2019 NY Times comment thread about Trump. The fake-liberals don’t even bother to hide their disdain for the Freedom of Speech. They don’t like you? You don’t get to speak. Damn good they don’t have any real power…

No RIght To Comment

Another RIght Wing Liberal

Illegal To Say Bitch copy

CLICK to read about this idiocy…

Cuomo Strikes Again

Yet another case of a self-described liberal (meaning CLOSET FASCIST) usingFlashing Penny our government to shit on the First Amendment. New York’s Cuomo Administration says that people LOSE THE RIGHTS TO FREE SPEECH IF THEY SPEND $5,000 OR MORE TO MAKE A STATEMENT. So much for NO LAW ABRIDGING “the freedom of speech right of the people… and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The victim of this travesty is suing. As she should. Spend $4,999.99 and you have legal rights? But ONE LOUSY PENNY MORE and you don’t? 

Billboard Case

Click The Image To Read About This Insanity

SHE WON!!

She Won The Case

Click Image To Read Details

Remember, hypocritical liberals are nothing new. Here’s Phil Ochs in the 1960s:

 

 

 

 

Why I Am Not a Liberal (By Scott Ross – Shared From “So few critics, so many poets”)

April 11, 2019

By Scott Ross In a waning year of the Roaring ‘20s Bertrand Russell famously delivered a lecture entitled “Why I Am Not a Christian.” Although I pretend to nothing approaching Russell’s excellent mind, nor to his precise articulation of its febrile thoughts, and while I do not for a moment imagine it is as courageous […]

CLICK: Why I Am Not a Liberal —
So few critics, so many poets

Wow…

February 18, 2018

“Never Let Fear Go To Waste” – Corporate Motto

April 18, 2017
Remember when I said that because of the 19 months of intense fear and hysteria deliberately aimed at the American people during the election… it would not be over on election day? By now, it is as clear as a country stream that I was right.
Far too many people allowed themselves to get habituated to the election cycle’s media onslaught of fear, rage, and hysteria and now they just cannot let it go.
They have accepted the fear and rage, they have internalized it. For many Americans, fear and rage are here to stay.
Ever see people who, 25 years after a divorce, still obsess on and on about an ex? That is the condition of many people now. And the whole Russia panic stems from that. Somebody “other” must be to blame because I AM GOOD.
That 19 month orgy of election fear and rage was a calculated, sadistic thing done to Americans for the gain of a small group of people. And if only a small percentage of the public became deranged in the face of this constant barrage of fear and rage, that amounts to millions of people.
We were played.
We were tortured.
We were mind-fucked.
For 19 months.
Prisons are forbidden to do these things to inmates. But corporate media does it to us all. And we are considered “free”.
Corporations make money from fear. Whether they sell us deodorant, guns, or war… fear to them means money in the bank.
“News” ratings (which translate to dollars) skyrocket in war time. You think, knowing that, that media corporations leave war to mere chance?
Yes, America endured a well-coordinated brainwashing for 19 months. And casualties were not just inevitable, they were desired!  Keeping people like this means money. Media barons knew full well that many people cannot walk away from that kind of brainwashing intact. Remember this when you see people who idolize a candidate – and refuse to let go. Saying such insane things as “he” or “she” is THE REAL PRESIDENT.
TV producers and their partners in advertising live to erase reality and replace it with an illusion that benefits their corporations.  And they are highly rewarded for this action.
Why do you suppose someone like Rachel Maddow insists on pushing unproven “reality” theories on her viewers five nights a week? Maddow has 30,000 reasons for doing this – every day.
And she is not alone. We have no idea who writes the things she, and others of her odious ilk, deliver into our homes. We know nothing about these people who continue the fear and rage that was stoked during the election.Nothing except the clear fact that they feed on the fear and rage like vampires feeding on our blood. They live for this. That is their job.

News today has become that guy in the saloon who eggs on two drunks till they beat each other senseless. Nothing ever happens to him, though. Today, international news in American media boils down to that guy saying, “Are you gonna take that from him?”
We desperately need free universal mental health care in this country because we have media corporations dedicated to messing with our minds.
We need it to cope with and repair the damage inflicted by corporate media.
Whether media corporations do this stuff to get us to crave a useless product or they do it to get us to accept the latest war – they are screwing with our minds in an unethical and immoral – but highly profitable way.
And the society we now live in is the result.
——

                             OPEN YOUR EYES

Originally published in 1919, this book tells how to SHED FEAR that is planted in our lives by people who seek to control us. Newly edited with a fresh introduction that puts the book in its historical context while showing why it is important even today! If you have any desire to live a life FREE of FEAR, then this classic book is the book to read! Get one for yourself and get some for your friends. THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOKS EVER PUBLISHED! And now, thanks to MOJO BROS. CLASSIC EDITIONS, it is back again. And considering the state of the world today, it is here just in time.

There is no reason to live a life of  fear! Wake up to the way orthodox religion & Other “Powers That Be” control the population THROUGH FEAR! An invaluable treatise, this book is a must-read for anyone who wants to lead a free, independent life. A life WITHOUT FEAR! While some people will no doubt be offended and shocked by this book’s stance against organized religion seeking to control our lives, while those who use fear themselves will attempt to squelch this book by misrepresenting the contents and belittling it, this book bravely exposes the way the manipulators of fear seek to hold onto power by any means necessary. Beware of those who would mislead you about this! Fear is all they have and they will use fear to stop YOU from reading this liberating book. The new introduction puts the book in its historical context and shows why it is still relevant to us today.

TO GET YOUR COPY CLICK HERE or Click the image

       Click this Image To Read About The Book

Family Dysfunction Persisted

March 21, 2017

As you may have heard by now, noted literary lion Chelsea Clinton has published a new book.
With a speed of hand that would shame Mickey Spillane or Edgar Wallace, the Great Weird Hope of the Clinton dynasty got a book deal (the favored corporate method for bribing people in political life) and in doing so she inadvertently shows us how untreated child-abuse travels through the generations.

The book bears the name SHE PERSISTED, a PR phrase coined to promote another book deal – that one for the already wealthy Senator Elizabeth Warren.

In the Clinton Clan, persisting has a perverse history.

By now, who doesn’t know the story of Hillary as a 4 year-old getting thrown out of the house by her abusive mother? The child had endured taunting from bullies in the park, as most children do, and so she ran home to her mother for comfort and succor. What did this FOUR YEAR-OLD CHILD get instead? As Hillary compulsively relates it over and over again, even 65 years later, her mother had the love and foresight and compassion to… throw her out of the house.
Mother Rodham blamed little Hillary for the situation, said she “gave up” and called her daughter a coward who she would not welcome in the home until THE BABY dealt with the tormentors.
Slam went the door. Does anyone, other than Hillary, really believe this callous treatment had a salubrious effect on the child?

Hillary Clinton has, for the past 65 years, related that story with pride. She says it shaped her character. Well, yes, it did. But not the way she seems to think. To Hillary Clinton, giving up means losing mother’s love and – more to the point – getting kicked out of the house. One can only imagine the depths of fear and anxiety – Separation Anxiety – this “loving mother” sparked in her infant child.

As Dr. Gabor Maté notes: “In an anecdote related by the former Secretary of State herself as an example of salutary character building, four-year-old Hillary runs into her home to escape neighbourhood bullies. ‘There is no room for cowards in this house,’ says her mother, sending the child out into the street to face her tormentors. The real message was: ‘Do not feel or show your pain. You are on your own.’ Over six decades later the candidate hides her pneumonia even from her doctor and from those closest to her. Repeatedly she has overlooked her husband’s outlandish infidelities, defending him against disgrace— no doubt suppressing her own emotional turmoil in the process.”
(Emphasis added)

Hillary Clinton has never received treatment for this early-childhood trauma – and to me, every single time she relates the story she presents a 4 year-old’s repressed cry for help. To this day, Clinton shows an irrational view of the world as a place populated by “bullies” who she, and she alone, MUST stop. She even cited this as her Raison D’être for seeking the Presidency upon receiving the democratic nomination.

And then, in her own words, spoken in her first speech after losing the election, Hillary Clinton had one strong message:

For Mrs. Clinton, 65 years after her mother terrorized her by throwing her out of the only home she knew, giving up – no matter how useless the fight may be – means the loss of love and home.
Sheer stubbornness has become a virtue in Hillary-Land. What manner of person NEVER concedes loss? Or error? Or understands the pragmatic need for a strategic concession to an opponent? I’ll tell you what manner of person: A DANGEROUS PERSON.

Untreated family abuse wends its way down through the ensuing generations. So it came as no surprise to me to see that Chelsea Clinton, an adult-child who owes everything she ever got to her parents, also carries this mania. And in the aftermath of her mother’s embarrassing election loss to a known “bully” and TV game-show host, it falls upon the adult-child to become the mother Hillary wanted but never had. Thus the topic of Chelsea’s new book fits right into mommy’s mania – as the cover makes crystal clear:

The child taking care of the needs of the mother perverts the natural flow of life. Yet this child – at age 35 – has made a career of just that. Making speeches for mother (and in a subtle way sabotaging her in the process – displaying resentment) and even talking of entering politics herself – a clear attempt by a child to vindicate the family after repeated losses and scandals. I mean, let’s face it, after seeing the sheer hell that BOTH her parents underwent, what child would say “THAT’S the career for me!”? Would Chuck Wepner, Jr. ever consider boxing? Hell, even the NIXON off-spring knew better…

Does Chelsea really see stubbornness as a virtue? Or has she taken up the call simply to soothe her wounded mother? And for god sake WHY peddle this swill to CHILDREN? Can this adult-child not relate her feelings to grown people? I see it as bad enough when family abuse gets passed on through the generations. But to deliberately pass it on to children one does not even know becomes a form of mass abuse. All to justify a mother who has long had the time and ample financial resources to GET THERAPY and change the warped view of the world she brags about carrying… ONE speech to Wall Street would have paid for Hillary’s therapy and then some.

Upon seeing the announcement of this book, I got hit with a wave of sadness. I hoped that Chelsea’s children don’t face similar horrendous abuse. Considering that the abuse has gotten mythologized as “character building,” will Chelsea take the chance to throw her own children out of the house at age 4? Will she do as her grandmother did, and make a mother’s love conditional

If Chelsea sees the delusion of stubbornness as a virtue, and sees it as good enough to spread to countless unknown children through her book – I wonder how she sees her own children? And their children after her? Where does it end. When she has a son, will she name him SUE?

Well, that comprises the problem which the Clintons must one day face. OUR problem, I see as more alarming: We as a nation must learn to stop electing to positions of power those damaged people who still suffer under the weight of untreated childhood abuse. But because of the alarming rate of abuse in America, such wounded and deluded people resonate with the bulk of our neighbors. Possibly even you… or me.