Archive for the ‘Gulf War’ Category

A Teaser…

June 29, 2020

Soon I Shall Tell You





Speaking of Politicians…

We know what American politicians love best – WAR. These maniacs see everything as a YOU AGAINST ME proposition. War on Poverty… War on Drugs… War on a Virus… Mostly war against some nation with a GDP far less than the monetary value of the bombs dropped on them, blowing them up so we can have a sense of “victory”. Politicians know that using WAR is a war to quash dissent. People question the loyalty, patriotism, even the SANITY of anyone who asks WHY ARE WE DOING THIS?
What a deadly way to live! Here is a book I believe EVERYONE should read! It tells, bluntly, who we as a nation are AND WHY WE HAVE GONE TO WAR almost non-stop since we began as a nation!

War Is A Racket Announcement

Click Image To Enlarge

Click HERE To See This Book At AMAZON.COM!

FROM MOJO BROS. PUBLISHING: Two-Time Medal of Honor recipient Maj. Gen. Smedley D. Butler’s famous essay on the horrors and futility of war – now in a facsimile edition. Peeling away the patriotic veneer used to win support for war, Butler tells why we go to war, who is behind it and who profits.
This book contains a FACSIMILE of the 1935 original. And more!
In the 1930s, a cabal of Wall Street businessmen, alarmed by what President Franklin D. Roosevelt was doing to spur the economy, planned to remove FDR. The plan – known as The Business Plot – called for rallying disaffected WW1 Veterans under a military leader who could unite them. That man, these plotters thought, was the retired Maj. Gen. Butler. They tried to win Butler to their cause with a promise of making him the a national dictator. They could not have been more mistaken! This book has a section showing Butler’s role in revealing this treasonous plot.
In an ALL-NEW forward, we tell the story of those times and – for the first time ever! – present recently declassified documents from Smedley Butler’s FBI file!


Thanks For Nothing…

January 8, 2020

At what point will America stop and realize we’ve
done enough damage to the people of Iran?

Shah Alpert

Decoding The Cult Of Thunberg

September 23, 2019

Ok. We need to differentiate between
CRITICISM and ATTACK.

So many people see a child and right away their BULLSHIT DETECTOR goes on the fritz. Well, pay attention, because today we’re getting heaps of manipulative bullshit from the child Greta Thunberg. The people who handle her have clearly seen to it that she is EXTREMELY WELL TRAINED in the art of deflecting criticism. With that in mind, I shall dissect her cheap rhetorical ploys.
Overall, Thunberg has been well-coached in the use of TWO FALLACIES OF LOGIC:

1) She opens her speeches with the fallacy of logic called POISONING THE WELL – by denouncing in advance anyone who takes a critical look at her, as A HATER.

2) Then, after characterizing all who dare question her as mean old adults, Thunberg employs the fallacy of logic called AD MISERICORDIAM. She does this by first saying, with voice quivering, “I’m JUST a child!” – an odd statement for a normal 16-year old. After that, Thunberg recites a list all her supposed infirmities: Asperger’s Syndrome… ADHD… OCD… Eating Disorders… High-Functioning Autism… and this winner: SELECTIVE MUTISM.
With Selective  Mutism, Thunberg suddenly loses the ability to speak to anyone outside her family. How convenient that she gets stricken with this “condition” whenever she is asked serious questions that challenge her narrative.

It’s all typical DEMAGOGUE bullshit, and if the gullible people who fall for it ever heard an adult speaking like this – someone like, say, oh, Donald Trump – they would denounce the speaker in a New York minute. Because they would listen critically.

People have fallen for this routine over and over.

Bana Alamed, the manufactured child savior of Syria, comes to mind.

As does the doe-eyed child who called herself Nayirah.

kuwaiti-nurse-nayirah-gives-a-fabricated-testimony-to-the-congressional-human-rights-caucus-us-congress-washington-dc-10-october-1990

Claiming to be a nurse from Kuwait, Nayirah went before the Congressional Human Rights Caucus on October 10, 1990, during the run-up to the Iraq Invasion. There, this child delivered completely fabricated testimony about Iraqi soldiers wrenching new-born babies from incubators (children again!) to die in agony on a cold hospital floor. Millions of Americans uncritically swallowed up that patent nonsense, and as a result thousands of people died and uncounted more were maimed and/or left destitute in a pointless war. This child’s parents (she is the daughter of Saud Al-Sabah, then the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States) in conjunction with script writers from the American PR firm Hill & Knowlton, turned this girl into a war criminal at the age of 15. Those who fell for it are equally complicit. And to this day, nearly 30 years later people keep falling for this tactic.

More recently, starting in 2014, we saw the horrific case of Devonte Hart and the rest of the children in his “extended family”.

Devonte Hart hug

At the age of 12, Hart’s popularity peaked when he was photographed doling out hugs in the streets of Portland, OR, at a protest over the lack of an indictment in the notorious Ferguson, MO shooting case. At the time, I told people who fell for this obvious baloney that it was all a set up. Looking at many photos, more than that one famous one, showed it was clearly a manipulated event. For pointing this out, I was denounced as, you guessed it, a Hater and a Racist.

180328212418-hart-family-exlarge-169

Needless to say, I heard no apologies from those credulous people later, in 2018, when the whole sordid story came out. It turned out that a pair of heartless adults who acted as parents had used Devonte and a bevy of adopted kids to carve out a career for themselves by expertly shuttling the children from one public tragedy to another, all in the name of “Social Justice.” At each location, Jennifer and Sarah Hart would fabricate media glurge in the form of sappy, but reassuring, “interracial” Kumbaya photo-ops complete with tears and hugs. This scam came to an abrupt end when the manipulative women who had amassed this politically correct minority “family”… brutally killed all the children in a gruesome murder/suicide. Reporters investigating the family – only after the murders – uncovered more than a decade of abuses committed by Jennifer and Sarah Hart.

Hart Mugshot

Sarah Hart’s mug shot December 27, 2010, arrested for misdemeanor domestic assault and malicious punishment of a child.

The children, it emerged, were routinely beaten and starved when not on display to serve the whims of the adults. Why didn’t reporters investigate the family before this hideous ending? After all, records existed documenting the assaults on the children by the two women. The whole story was there for anyone to see. IF they bothered to look. So why did the story not come out in the press until it was too late? Because of… The Children. Anyone who dared to apply critical thinking to the obviously fishy situation prior to the mass murder was immediately denounced as a racist and a child-hater. See the pattern? It’s about squelching thought and discussion.

The immediate public acceptance of anything, no matter how idiotic, that issues forth from the mouth of a pint-sized Charlie McCarthy IS PRECISELY WHY the people controlling Thunberg have gone out of their way to use a child for their purposes. Children, properly trained, act as shields for their controllers as surely as the National Rifle Association provides cover for politicians. Children inhibit open and frank conversation, and conversation of any sort is the last thing a demagogue wants.

Judging from the jaw-dropping admiration children inspire, they are granted immunity from criticism – after all, they’re so cute. And honest. And far too many adults swallow it without giving what these children say a moment of critical thought.

That’s why this game pops up again and again and again. After “The Angry Greta Thunberg Show” has run its course, and it will as surely as you can say “David Hogg” or “Emma Gonzalez,” we shall undoubtedly be treated to another seemingly precocious pubescent pipsqueak filling the void with a Life-Or-Death message. In terms of marketing, having a malleable child deliver the pitch is the next best thing to finding a puppy that speaks. Woof Woof, y’all…

Paper Moon


With Thunberg, once again, FEAR gets trotted out – and once again through a child – so that you and I will get manipulated into UNCRITICALLY ACCEPTING a line of BULLSHIT that is used to sell us things we do not need. In this case, any product labeled GREEN. It’s the same way people not that long ago fell for OATBRAN in everything – and before that CHLOROPHYLL. Buy GREEN or… we will all die!!!
This kind of marketing works, especially when marketeers use children to pitch the horrors facing us. That technique, especially invoking THE CHILDREN, is an old –  dare I say VENERABLE? – technique. Why? Because… it works. Here is a perfect example of the way a swindling demagogue manipulates people through fear. Note the many appeals to the heart, from patriotism, history, morality, fear and… THE CHILDREN.

The more you know about THE MERCHANTS OF FEAR and their methods, the less likely you are to fall for their line of bullshit. Here is a book, written 100 years ago, that explains this. I have written the introductory material for a new version.

Click this Image To Read About The Book

Originally published in 1919, this book tells how to SHED THE FEAR that experts deliberately plant in our lives; experts who seek to control us for their own ends. If you have any desire to live a life FREE of FEAR, then this classic book is the book to read! Get one for yourself and get some for your friends. THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOKS EVER PUBLISHED! And now, thanks to MOJO BROS. CLASSIC EDITIONS, it is back again. And considering the state of the world today, it is here just in time. Click the image to see this book at AMAZON.

EXTRACT FROM AN AMAZON REVIEW:

Please, everybody! Grab up a copy of UNMASKING FEAR! and read it!
Why? This book explains in crystal clarity HOW and WHY unconscionable individuals and organizations saturate others with FEAR every single day, which tactic is not new, it’s been going on as long as people have been thieves and hungry to steal the freedom and goods of others. This book was penned in 1919, and while the clothing styles have changed, the innards remain the same!
We are barraged with FEAR TACTICS daily by those who eagerly take money out of our pockets; usurp the freedom from our lives and keep us as slaves by clouding our thoughts with FEAR. In 1919, Lloyd Kenyon Jones framed his arguments against the rules of early twentieth century organized religions, and how they frightened many away from independent thinking by threats of devils and hellfire, but hypocritically altered their policies when parishioners backed away. Was God wrong when the Church said that anesthesia was the ‘work of the devil,’ and if so, why did God change his mind? I would ask in 2018, are all of the Catholic people who went to hell for eating meat on Friday stuck down there forever, even though the meat thing is no longer considered a sin, or did somebody make a mistake? Or, perhaps . . . eat a steak..?

READ MORE AT THIS LINK

 

He Sure Has A Lot To Learn About Being President…

February 8, 2017

President Trump could have avoided all the lawsuits and all that protesting if, instead of banning travel from those 7 countries, he dropped 27,000 bombs on them. Per year.
THAT, nobody cares about… It worked wonders for the other guy.

us_air_force_090318-f-0000k-900_dropping_bombs

Gullible People, Rise Up!

January 29, 2017
The 19 month election was a fear-con. We were given nothing but NAZI! FASCIST! WE’RE GONNA DIE! over and over.
People were scared and angry.
People are still scared and angry.
Angry, frightened people are very easy to con.
For instance, how many of us believed the story that Trump’s travel ban excluded nations he does business with?
His ban only mentions one nation: SYRIA. The others are “nations of concern” as listed in a law signed by Pres. Obama.
Remember the protest when that happened?
Neither do I.
You may wish to educate yourself HERE
screen-shot-2017-01-29-at-6-46-13-pm
But fear and anger is what led people to buy, without question, the fake story about Trump’s business interests. As if he really has any!
Fooling people by making them scared and angry is such an old technique that there was a Broadway show about exactly this technique.
So if you believed that Trump specifically named 7 countries and excluded those he does business with, then you were played as easily as the corn-fed jays in Iowa.

About The Election…

December 8, 2016

This is all I will say on the election for quite some time:

As I listen to noted “progressives” and “leftists” currently bemoaning the election of Donald Trump, it becomes clear that they think we had a marvelously progressive, 180º opposite, Democratic candidate in November and we blew it by picking Hitler.

Don’t they recall what the choice really was?

In setting the record straight, a phrase beloved of Mrs. Clinton’s acolytes as they distorted her record of war and under-achievement, I can only repeat some facts:

1) Polling consistently showed that nearly 60% of Trump voters DO NOT support him. They voted for him only as a way of stopping Hillary Clinton. All the hand-wringing over the “racists” and “nazis” and “angry white people” who allegedly voted for Trump crumbles when this is taken into consideration. But it never is mentioned. It is far easier to demonize and rationalize than to analyze.

2) Scared because Trump denies environmental science? The Democrat “alternative” was also a science denier – one must be a denier in order to support fracking. So we had ZERO choice there.

3) Trump will start WW3? The Democrat “alternative” was also a war-mongering, China threatening, candidate as we witness in her own words: “Russia’s hacked into a lot of things. China’s hacked into a lot of things. Russia even hacked into the Democratic National Committee, maybe even some state election systems. So, we’ve got to step up our game. Make sure we are well defended and able to take the fight to those who go after us. As President, I will make it clear, that the United States will treat cyber attacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic and military responses.”
And then we have her stated desire to “ring China with missile defense” to protect against North Korea and set up a no-fly zone in Syria (where she personally sabotaged a cease-fire), and to rig elections in other nations. She publicly supported the concept and execution of covert wars of regime change.  Zero choice there.

4) Aghast that Trump nominated people from Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street banks to his proposed cabinet? Have we already forgotten the $22,000,000 Wall Street Banks paid to Clinton in just under 24 months? You think they did that with no expectation of results? Again, ZERO choice.

5) Opposing dangerous pipelines an issue? Have we also forgotten the millions of dollars Mrs. Clinton snatched up for speeches made in Canada where she spoke in direct support of the Keystone XL pipeline?  Zero choice again.

6) Libya, Syria, Honduras… and the “progressives” think we mistakenly elected a war-monger? We had no choice BUT to elect one.

7) Worried about the privatization (destruction) of Social Security under Trump? Again, ZERO choice in that regard. Clinton repeatedly spoke of means-testing social security as a way to make it over as welfare for the “neediest recipients,” as she phrased it. And she has a track record, through the Democratic Leadership Council and her support of her “co-president’s” welfare reform, of gutting the safety net. How long before she’d have talked in glowing terms of “ending Social Security as we know it”?

8) Afraid we will lose our precious constitutional rights under Trump? If so… where have you been? Hillary Clinton made her campaign a vote on continuing the Obama legacy. Look at the rights that man took away as he gleefully continued and expanded the “W” legacy. Think SNOWDEN. On this point, I agree with friend John Hubbard who noted that fighting for our rights mean nothing if WW3 busts out, and, as noted above, Clinton showed all the signs of itching to start the Big One. Trump may be a threat to many treasured government protections and programs. Hillary was, as the pentagon calls them, an EXISTENTIAL threat to our very survival. Her insane plans for a no-fly zone in Syria (where the crumbling, feeble ISIS doesn’t have a single aircraft) was meant to provoke the Russians – who in her demented view are the bullies standing between herself and the love her mother denied her. Eliminating this crazy person was priority #1. We took care of that. Now on to fighting Trump if you disagree with him. At least we are alive to do it.

9) Don’t know where Trump stands on issues from day to day? He seems “unpredictable”? Ok. How do you know where Clinton stands? I refer you to WikiLeaks and Clinton’s stunning admission that she holds one position in public and another in private. There is no way of knowing what, aside from her own ambition, Clinton believes in. Again, ZERO choice.

10) Here is the bottom line as I see it: Because of corporate media collusion with the two dominant parties, we had a pair of crappy candidates to decide between. Either way we were going to get a crappy president. With Trump, we got a crappy president AND we got rid of the money grubbing, influence peddling Clinton “dynasty” – including the atrocious Rodham Brothers (conveniently hidden this time around). That is called taking lemons and making lemonade.

—-

Acting as though America elected a despot – when there were two despots running for Imperial President – misses the point and evinces a peculiar form of denial.

Given the choice we had, not the choice we wish we had – to paraphrase old Rumsfeld – I believe the nation made the only proper decision. We shattered Bill Clinton, Inc. and showed the democrats that they cannot run hacks from the past and expect their traditional voters to support them.

Now that voters have eliminated the neo-liberal DLC candidate, we will turn our concentration to the task neutralizing the objectionable parts of Trump’s neo-Reagan agenda.

But that takes work, and it requires letting go of the constant parade of fake predictions that fill news outlets (even as they whine about “fake news”) as if we have not endured 16 straight years of the very things people now claim only Trump will suddenly bring.

Work.

Not whining about the election.

Work.

Not the Oppression Olympics, which says that only certain people have a right to say they will suffer under Trump.

Work.

If you oppose Trump, you have just UNDER TWO YEARS to flip the congress.

That is the same amount of time Hillary Clinton devoted to getting her $22,000,000 from Wall Street.
donald-and-hillary

Voter Intimidation Means WE ARE WINNING!

September 28, 2016

Those of us who will not vote for either of the media-selected elderly, unemployed millionaires have taken a lot of attacking for sticking to principles. But we ARE WINNING! Look at this from the President of the United States:

“If you vote for a 3rd party candidate that’s a vote for Trump,” Obama said during an interview on Steve Harvey’s radio show.

Third-Party Voters: THIS IS THE FIRST BIG SIGN THAT WE ARE SUCCESSFUL!

Look how frightened the neoliberals are!
If our “insignificant protest vote” is meaningless, then this would not matter to the President.
With this comment, Obama is saying is HE IS POWERLESS AND THAT WE HAVE THE POWER!

Here is what a republican says:
“So let me be clear: a vote for anyone other than Donald Trump in November is a vote for Hillary Clinton.” – Scott Walker

Isn’t it delicious that Mr. Obama is so frightened of you that he has sunk to the level of SCOTT WALKER?
They are both reduced to SCARE TACTICS because of YOU AND ME saying we will vote our conscience.
They both cannot be right… but they both can most certainly be wrong.

Keep it up, friends! If our votes didn’t matter Obama would never have said this.

And don’t let anyone smugly call your vote “a protest vote” as the Withers do. Voting for a candidate who is on the ballot is NOT a protest, it is a well-reasoned choice. Remember the freedom to choose? I thought “liberals” were big on that. Again, we see the wisdom of Phil Ochs, who sagely observed: 

“Liberals are 10º to the left of center in good times but 10º to the right of center when it affects them personally.”

Friends, the condescending dismissal of a rational, thoughtful vote as “protest” is odious on many levels. Not least of which is that America was founded on protest.
Protest is enshrined in our Bill of Rights. The Withers reveal their fascist, anti-American attitude every time they denounce protest. In short: screw ’em. They are not what America is about.

maxresdefault

Reading The Riot Act… Fair Warning, Withers.

September 8, 2016

There is a historical basis for the expression: reading the riot act. The act, known as “An Act for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies, and for the more speedy and effectual punishing the rioters,” was enacted by Parliament in 1715. Before arresting persons under this law, the law had to be read aloud, allowing people to disperse and to assure that they knew they were in violation of the law.

People talk of the death penalty being in the bible as a justification for capital punishment. But how was the biblical death penalty enforced back then? It was only invoked after a series of requirements were met – chief among them the criminal had to have been told in front of two witnesses that what he was about to do was indeed punishable by death.

People have to know before being held culpable.

Even the mythical Jesus of Nazareth said, “Forgive them for they know not what they do.”

Well I am putting Withers on notice: If you are With ➡︎HER then you side with murder and death on a global scale.

Hillary Clinton’s stated Raison D’être, from her own mouth, for being the president is to be able to launch war to ATTACK and DESTROY countries she sees as led by “bullies,” a mind-numbingly jejune attitude for an elderly woman to have. It reeks of the schoolyard she must have dreaded as a child.

screen-shot-2016-09-08-at-7-50-29-pm

As Secretary of state, Clinton’s bloodlust and eagerness to fight anyone she perceives as a bully led to the massacres in Libya, and Syria, and Honduras. And she refuses to acknowledge it. Worse, she DEFENDS it.

screen-shot-2016-09-08-at-7-52-38-pm

This is who Hillary Clinton is. A neocon warrior who will plunge the world into more wars. Neocon Republican Robert Kagan said to the NY Times in 2014: “I feel comfortable with her on foreign policy,” Mr. Kagan said, adding that the next step after Mr. Obama’s more realist approach “could theoretically be whatever Hillary brings to the table” if elected president. “If she pursues a policy which we think she will pursue,” he added, “it’s something that might have been called neocon, but clearly her supporters are not going to call it that; they are going to call it something else.”
This praise is from the neocons who planned her run for years while you Withers were not paying attention. As the NY Times discovered in 2014. The people who needlessly invaded Iraq and Afghanistan – where America STILL wages war to this very day are WITH ➡︎HER.

screen-shot-2016-09-08-at-7-59-26-pm

She is a neocon. Why do you suppose almost all the G. W. Bush team endorses her? Because they like change and peace?

Where Hillary Clinton gets her deep need to fight and destroy, whence her fixation with seeing bullies under her bed, I leave that to the psychiatrists she should have had treating her over the course of her life. But there is a clear sickness there. And for the world, there is stark  danger.

As the late-Christopher Hitchens cogently noted in 2008: “As for Mrs. Clinton, as for all she’s done for us and after all she’s suffered on our behalf, she feels she’s owed the presidency and who could possibly disagree? Her life is meaningless if she doesn’t get at least a shot and one can only sympathize. Unless you think, as I do, that people should be distrusted, who are running for therapeutic reasons,” said Hitchens. “Because the Presidency doesn’t calm those demons, as her husband has already proved.”

Hillary Clinton NEEDS war. Fighting is central to her stated image of herself. Fighting defines her. She is a HAWK who quotes Reagan at every opportunity.

screen-shot-2016-09-08-at-8-07-34-pm

Last night in a softball TV interview on being Commander-in-Chief, Clinton said she will destroy Syria through air power.

Vote for her and you support that.  Period.  There is no wiggle room.

NO MORE UNCONSTITUTIONAL WARS OF CHOICE.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you support wars.

And more wars.

Your vote will say it is just fine with you. Hillary will use YOUR vote to claim a mandate. Then she will attack.

And the blood of innocents will be on your hands.
Not mine.
I will never support any conservative war-hawk.
You have been warned.
You have no excuse now.
This is the Riot Act.

People have to know before being held culpable.
NOW YOU KNOW

 

The Sting, Part Three…

June 4, 2016

sting
See all those LIKES? All those SHARES in the post above? All is going exactly as planned… planned by Trump.
And the posting group makes the claim that “this so needed to be said”?

Yeah. That’s Trump’s sentiment in a nutshell. He needs this constant media coverage.

Just keep posting articles about him. Keep talking about him on CNN. That kind of media coverage is how Trump wiped out all competition in the primaries. But you weren’t looking because you were reading how he was a buffoon doomed to fail.

Don’t these media saps know that Trump says all those “insane” things PRECISELY so he can suck all the oxygen out of the room? Or, as he said it, “I’m going to suck all the oxygen out of the room. I know how to work the media in a way that they will never take the lights off of me.”

The LIKES and SHARES and COMMENTARY on the post above? Just what Trump wants.

To repeat: “I know how to work the media in a way that they will never take the lights off of me.”

Don’t people constantly say TRUMP IS A CON MAN? We all know he is a con-man, yet look at all the press he generates.

He knows what every successful con man knows: when the marks are blown off, they should not even know they’ve been played. This is why so many Trump University suckers ARE SATISFIED.

Now look how PROUD the marks who posted the story above are… for what? For just having posted this.  They got stung, they don’t know it, and I assure you they will come back for more.
(And no, I shared an image NOT the link. Sharing these links is for saps.)

Listen: Concerning all the web links on Social Media to items like SHE TAKES DOWN TRUMP AND IT’S AMAZING!… no it is not amazing. IT IS PUBLICITY and that is precisely what Trump counts on.
Didn’t you read this explanation of HOW HE DID IT?
“I’m going to walk away with it and win it outright. I’m going to get in and all the polls are going to go crazy. I’m going to suck all the oxygen out of the room. I know how to work the media in a way that they will never take the lights off of me.”

And that is exactly what Trump’s “The Judge Is A Hateful Mexican” ploy did, with an assist from FOX/Megyn Kelly. Before that, people were talking about the California Primary. Now they are talking only about Trump. And that works to his benefit.

Trump won the primary contest that way and the only thing that I find AMAZING is… people still fall for it.

Until the AWESOME SPEECH, Everyone was talking about Hillary and Sanders meeting up in the California primary, but now the lights are all on Trump. ONE MORE TIME: “I know how to work the media in a way that they will never take the lights off of me.”
All the people gloating over his EPIC TAKEDOWN are a species of ripe marks such as Barnum never imagined.

Yes, the Withers are all agog over Clinton’s EPIC TAKEDOWN of Trump, but is that speech enough for a campaign? Think Hillary’s speech is a winner? Well, she cannot run on that. Sooner or later Hillary will have to answer questions.
AND SHE HAS NOT HAD A PRESS CONFERENCE IN SIX MONTHS.
Kinda takes the bite out of calling Trump a coward. But, hey, she has that speech.
“Remember that speech I gave in June?” will not make a successful campaign.

The Democrats need a strong candidate. One not under a cloud for violating security laws and violating the Freedom of Information Act. Just when the Republicans have their worst candidate in 50 years, the DNC anoints Nixon in a Pants Suit. Brilliant move.
When the convention comes about there will be a choice because no matter what the Withers say, nobody gets the nomination on pledged delegates with fewer than 59% of the total. And Hillary isn’t going to get that.

The Super Delegates will have to decide which democrat is stronger.  The numbers? This is the number the delegates had best pay attention to… Trump is WAY more trusted than Clinton. Get a strong, TRUSTED candidate or else Trump wins. We have to do better than THESE TWO:

19%

The Clintons and Plantation Politics

April 15, 2016
hillary-clinton-old-hag-7

*****

There is a big swing Sanders will soon take against Clinton and she knows it is coming. Yet I predict she will be compelled to walk right into it; even force Sanders to use it.
Both Clintons cling to the patronizing, condescending, extremely White supremacist notion that Black people in America are either criminals or crime victims, all of whom desperately need help to stand on their own two feet. All Black youth are “inner city” denizens who live “at risk.”
In Clintonian America, Black people seem to have a very narrow range of concerns. When Sunday rolls around and the Clintons inflict themselves on every Black church from New England to the Mason Dixon Line, what do they talk about?
Will they ever take to the pulpit to discuss international trade? Global warming? GMOs? Health care? Regime Change (including Honduras) which the Clintons so love? The decline of the bees, so vital to agriculture? No. The message is always about crime, welfare, and “at risk” youth.
And if, at these events, a few Black persons should have the gall to rise up and show offense – then the Clintons erupt is an orgy of self-congratulation about all the Black people they saved from either a life of crime or from the bullets of criminals.
Here is Bill when challenged by BLM:
“I had an assault weapons ban in it [the crime bill]. I had money for inner-city kids, for out of school activities. We had 110,000 police officers so we could keep people on the street, not in these military vehicles, and the police would look like the people they were policing. We did all that. And [Joe] Biden [then senator and chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee] said, you can’t pass this bill, the Republicans will kill it, if you don’t put more sentencing in it.”
This is how Hillary and Bill always frame their appeal to African Americans.

And when she makes the inevitable strident attack on the Sanders civil rights record, he will take that swing I mentioned above:
Madam Secretary, I refuse to be criticized on the issue of Civil Rights by a former proud Goldwater Girl.

I believe Mrs. Clinton will invite this retort willingly – so that she can then comfortably and conveniently blame her loss on “that one damn Goldwater line Sanders said about me,” and not blame it on the clear fact that people just don’t want her, and don’t like her, and certainly do not trust her.